... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
@fisherman
amd that's the problem. It's not a conclusion. It's a fact. That is what was being spoken about, that is what they were referencing- actual consumption of blood. The Greek word used was to keep separate from, followed by blood being mentioned alongside eating sacrificial meet. It's not an interpretation. It's how it literally reads.
i remember studying this book years ago and how it impacted my belief system.
i no longer believe the bible is god's word.
however i do have a couple of lingering questions on this subject.
@razor
ahhh okay. So you're not a believer defending faith. I got the wrong impression. I still dot
mt think I'm understanding what you're looking for, but the epic of Gilgamesh predates the bible considerably and is believed it's what Noah is based on. I don't remember everything about it but I wanna say gods involved somewhere along the line.
... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
@fisherman
thing is, abstaining from blood is listed right along side abstaining from things sacrificed to idols.
What was sacrificed to idols?
a. Animals, meat.
What did they do with it?
a. Eat it.
When it says to abstain, what is meant?
a. Do not eat.
so when it says upstain from things sacrificed to idols AND FROM BLOOD, what is meant?
a. Do not eat sacrificial meat or blood.
Easy reasoning. Yet Paul makes it clear later that eating sacrificial meat was acceptable because it lost its sacred meaning! So how much more so must blood be used to save a life, since sacredity of life was the point and life is always sacred!
i remember studying this book years ago and how it impacted my belief system.
i no longer believe the bible is god's word.
however i do have a couple of lingering questions on this subject.
@razor
i don't think I get what your asking for; are you asking for evidence that Heaven does not exist?
This is kind of the problem, there's no way to prove unequivocally God and heaven don't exist. I don't disbelieve because of this kind of proof. I don't believe there is a God because of evidence that disproves the bible, because of terrible things that have happened, because of the things you can look around and see religion doing in the name of their God. All of this is evidence that the bible and these groups are lies. When the things that are supposed to be from God are all lies and there are evidence against them - in my mind that discredits God pretty heavily.
I highly suggest reading Undeniable by bill Nye. He explains some things that very heavily influenced my reasoning on God.
i remember studying this book years ago and how it impacted my belief system.
i no longer believe the bible is god's word.
however i do have a couple of lingering questions on this subject.
Finkelsteina minute ago
pressman
Very true that the bible started all the beliefs about god. it makes sense that it would because it is the word of god.
Oh shit pressman there were ancient civilizations that predate the ancient Hebrews by thousands of years and they had other gods to worship than YHWH .
If that is true then the ancient Hebrews were not worshiping the right god , they were worshiping a pagan god distinct from the original true god.
Yea I didn't even mention this, I'd really like to know how you rationalize the bible itself saying worship of that God is older than itself with your post.... Lol (@pressman)
i remember studying this book years ago and how it impacted my belief system.
i no longer believe the bible is god's word.
however i do have a couple of lingering questions on this subject.
Uh-huh.
You're missing the point. Supposedly, the first man used by God was Moses. He began writing the bible after the mythical Exodus. Worship of this God, as well as many other deities, had already been around for 300+ years. The bible itself says that Melchizadek passed true worship to Abraham. Abraham lived long before Moses, long before the bible.
i remember studying this book years ago and how it impacted my belief system.
i no longer believe the bible is god's word.
however i do have a couple of lingering questions on this subject.
pressman20 minutes ago
Very true that the bible started all the beliefs about god. it makes sense that it would because it is the word of god.
Pressman, who wrote the first books of the bible?
keep it simple, one name is all that's necessary.
i remember studying this book years ago and how it impacted my belief system.
i no longer believe the bible is god's word.
however i do have a couple of lingering questions on this subject.
I said this elsewhere but,
1. The sun was a circle, apparently hung on nothing. The moon was a circle, apparently hung on nothing. The ancient people likely made the very small leap (if it's aleap) to the earth is also a circle hung on nothing.
2. The bible is not monotheistic. There are many gods in it. Even if you want to argue they only see one as true, the NT creates a binitary sort of God by establishing worship of God and Jesus both. This is a contradiction to everything in the Old Testament, which is why the Jews denied Jesus and Christianity was persecuted in Jerusalem.
There is no part of the bible that is accurate other than maybe the names of locations and historical events. But some of these are even misrepresentedm such as Daniel painting it as yet to happen when it was written after the fact.
The book of revelation is a bunch of symbolism that can fit any number of views. It's so vague you can apply it to tons of stuff, especially if your willing to be intellectually dishonest.
Its a ridiculous book. I.E., (and its FULL of this kind of crap)
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/203410001/lol-deut-13-1-5
this picture was taken from the official jw site.
just uploaded this one.
its new and unseen .
I don't see it. I've ner seen it.
But hey, if u need something equally misguided as them to get out and stay away that's fine; better than staying in.
... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
Those sort of JWs are beyond help.
That should not make us feel as if all attempts to make some of them question their beliefs are in vain.
This forum is a testimony to the fact that thousands of JWs have already done so.
Thats true, when I read that message I couldn't believe it though. I don't remember ever hearing that growing up. I think this is a gradual introduction. It might be that over time these such witnesses are going to be the majority. I hope not.
